![]() The groups opposing the ban, including the American Civil Liberties Union of Kentucky and Planned Parenthood, said Tuesday that the motion to dismiss the suit stemmed from the state Supreme Court's ruling “that took away health care providers’ ability to defend the rights of their patients.” Since the state's near-complete abortion ban took effect, abortion-rights groups say they have helped Kentuckians “get the care they need, including helping patients find care out of state.” “As a result of our efforts, I am proud to say that the elective abortion industry is out of business in Kentucky.”Īddia Wuchner, executive director of Kentucky Right to Life, hailed the development as a victory for anti-abortion groups, who strive to make the procedure “unthinkable.” “We are gratified that the abortion providers recognized their case should be dismissed,” Cameron said in a statement. Cameron said Tuesday that his office will steadfastly defend the state's anti-abortion laws. Republican state Attorney General Daniel Cameron's office has defended the bans. It does not include exceptions for cases of rape or incest. It bans abortions except when they’re carried out to save the life of the patient or to prevent disabling injury. The trigger law was passed in 2019 and took effect when Roe v. The legal challenge brought by the Louisville abortion providers revolves around Kentucky’s near-total trigger law ban and a separate six-week ban - both passed by the state's Legislature. The outcome highlighted what appeared to be a gap between voter sentiment and the expectations of Kentucky’s GOP-dominated Legislature. Last year, Kentucky voters rejected a ballot measure that would have denied any constitutional protections for abortion, handing a victory to abortion-rights supporters. The justices sent the case back to a circuit court in Louisville. The justices didn't resolve larger constitutional questions about whether access to abortion should be legal in the Bluegrass State.Ībortion providers challenged the ban on the premise that it violated patients’ constitutional rights, but the state's high court ruled that the providers lacked the “third-party standing” to do so. The plaintiffs in the Kentucky suit failed to get abortion access restored in a February ruling by Kentucky's Supreme Court that focused on narrow legal issues. Supreme Court’s ruling overturning Roe v. The current suit was filed by attorneys for the only two abortion clinics left in Kentucky when the state's ban on the procedure took effect following the 2022 U.S. “We will be back in court when we have a patient plaintiff,” Tamarra Wieder, Kentucky state director for Planned Parenthood Alliance Advocates, said in a statement. The groups' strategy will focus on the next legal challenge expected to come from pregnant women who were denied abortion services in Kentucky. (AP) - Abortion-rights groups filed a court motion Tuesday to dismiss their lawsuit challenging Kentucky's near-total abortion ban but signaled that the legal fight is far from over. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |